Unknown Egypt

de bene esse: literally, of well-being, morally acceptable but subject to future validation or exception

Egypt as the enigma of the pyramids, Egypt as the mystery of the Great Sphinx, Egypt as the mythical and fertile Nile, all images of eternity.

Yet over the centuries, the vision of specialists has shrunk, even narrowed. The land of miracles has been trivialized, the theories well-defined, the official nonsense endorsed and the subsidies channeled. So much so that for several decades, the real question is posed by amateurs, often enlightened, while Egyptologists dust the mummies that the director of Egyptian antiquities gives them, an exuberant and colorful character. The truth is out there...



If the famous riddle of the Sphinx has not been resolved by Oedipus? If its true secret was affecting its origin, the very old message worn on its sides? Many geologists have studied the effect of erosion traces on its body. This was an erosion by water, and not by wind as archaeologists previously claimed. According to the same geologists, the rain erosion which marks the rump of the Sphinx testifies to centuries of runoff. yet this area has been arid for 12,000 years.

To find a rainy climate there, we must go back to around -10,000, that is right in the Age of Leo. Thus it was at that time that the Sphinx was built. We also note that the head of the Sphinx was not affected by erosion. Is it newer? Maybe it was cut from a bigger head eroded by the rains, the head of a lion with its mane, for example? Here is the riddle of the Great Sphinx: "I was formerly a Lion, built in the Age of Leo, shortly after the great cataclysm."

If all the pyramids of Egypt are not antediluvian, the three pyramids on the Giza plateau undoubtedly are, as the pyramids of Dahshur. There would be therefore more than 12,000 years old. In this case, they were not built by the Pharaohs whose names they have.



These princes have appropriated already existing monuments, as it was the use at those days. Originally, these monuments were not designed as tombs. As Pharaohs always did, the restorer became the builder, and the Temple became his tomb.


The restorer may have raised up a pre-existent pyramid, or remade the white marble cladding. This is probably the only work of Sneferu, Cheops, Chephren and Mikerinos. A work, however, that time and looters have not respected: the marble claddings have now almost entirely disappeared, hence this aspect of giant staircase that now characterizes them. This is particularly unfortunate, because for Herodotus who had the chance to see them, these sidings were covered with hieroglyphics.

Did they testify that this pyramid was indeed the work of Cheops? It would prove nothing. Napoleon has carved his figure on the monuments of the countries he conquered. Signing is not building. And the real builders, moreover, have not signed anything. Neither the Cities of the Andes, nor Mycenae, nor the giant Olmec Heads, nor the statues of Easter Island, nor the Celt dolmens. None of the cyclopean monuments has any inscription. No manual either. The Megalithic people did not care. They did not have our worship of ego.

Source: http://eden-saga.com/en/egyptology-guizeh-snefrou-kheops-usurper-initiatic-temple-the-great-pyramid.html