When Newton was a young student beginning college, he drew up plans for a language based on the nature of things, rather than on mere convention. The idea was to “let the names of the same sorte of things begin with the same letter: as of Instruments with s; Beasts with t; The soules passions with b, etc.” In this way, words would not be mere arbitrary labels, haphazardly assigned. You could know from hearing a word what category of thing it belonged to. Additionally, prefixes and suffixes would indicate things like whether a word was a substance or an action, the actor or the acted upon, and so on. You could know, just by hearing a word, exactly what it meant.
This idea of a universal language where the words expressed their meaning through an orderly formula was in the air in the 17th century, and Newton was no doubt aware of the efforts that others had already made toward this end. There had been various plans published for languages based on symbols, numbers, or letters. Newton’s plan was based on letters, and by varying the letters in a word, you could vary its meaning in a predictable way.
Newton’s most fully worked-out example shows how prefixes could modify the meaning of tor(temperature) to produce all its related meanings:
utor, hot
owtor, exceeding hot
ǝwtor, very hot
awtor, pretty hot
ewtor, very little hot
iwtor, exceeding little hot
etor, warm
iytor, exceeding little cold
eytor, very little cold
aytor, indifferently cold
ǝytor, very cold
oytor, excessive cold
itor, cold
ator, neither very hot nor cold
ǝtor, pretty hot or pretty cold
otor, very hot or very cold
No comments:
Post a Comment