de bene esse: literally, of well-being, morally acceptable but subject to future validation or exception
ST. LOUIS (AP) — Doris Spates was a baby when her
father died inexplicably in 1955. She has watched four siblings die of
cancer, and she survived cervical cancer.
After learning that the Army conducted secret chemical testing in her
impoverished St. Louis neighborhood at the height of the Cold War, she
wonders if her own government is to blame.
In the mid-1950s, and again a decade later, the Army used motorized
blowers atop a low-income housing high-rise, at schools and from the
backs of station wagons to send a potentially dangerous compound into
the already-hazy air in predominantly black areas of St. Louis.
Local officials were told at the time that the government was testing a
smoke screen that could shield St. Louis from aerial observation in case
the Russians attacked.
But in 1994, the government said the tests were part of a biological
weapons program and St. Louis was chosen because it bore some
resemblance to Russian cities that the U.S. might attack. The material
being sprayed was zinc cadmium sulfide, a fine fluorescent powder.
Now, new research is raising greater concern about the implications of
those tests. St. Louis Community College-Meramec sociology professor
Lisa Martino-Taylor’s research has raised the possibility that the Army
performed radiation testing by mixing radioactive particles with the
zinc cadmium sulfide, though she concedes there is no direct proof.
But her report, released late last month, was troubling enough that both
U.S. senators from Missouri wrote to Army Secretary John McHugh
demanding answers.
Aides to Sens. Claire McCaskill and Roy Blunt said they have received no
response. Army spokesman Dave Foster declined an interview request from
The Associated Press, saying the Army would first respond to the
senators.
The area of the secret testing is described by the Army in documents
obtained by Martino-Taylor through a Freedom of Information Act request
as “a densely populated slum district.” About three-quarters of the
residents were black.
Spates, now 57 and retired, was born in 1955, delivered inside her
family’s apartment on the top floor of the since-demolished Pruitt-Igoe
housing development in north St. Louis. Her family didn’t know that on
the roof, the Army was intentionally spewing hundreds of pounds of zinc
cadmium sulfide into the air.
Three months after her birth, her father died. Four of her 11 siblings succumbed to cancer at relatively young ages.
“I’m wondering if it got into our system,” Spates said. “When I heard
about the testing, I thought, ‘Oh my God. If they did that, there’s no
telling what else they’re hiding.’”
Mary Helen Brindell wonders, too. Now 68, her family lived in a working-class mixed-race neighborhood where spraying occurred.
The Army has admitted only to using blowers to spread the chemical, but
Brindell recalled a summer day playing baseball with other kids in the
street when a squadron of green Army planes flew close to the ground and
dropped a powdery substance. She went inside, washed it off her face
and arms, then went back out to play.
Over the years, Brindell has battled four types of cancer — breast, thyroid, skin and uterine.
“I feel betrayed,” said Brindell, who is white. “How could they do this?
We pointed our fingers during the Holocaust, and we do something like
this?”
Martino-Taylor said she wasn’t aware of any lawsuits filed by anyone
affected by the military tests. She also said there have been no payouts
“or even an apology” from the government to those affected.
The secret testing in St. Louis was exposed to Congress in 1994,
prompting a demand for a health study. A committee of the National
Research Council determined in 1997 that the testing did not expose
residents to harmful levels of the chemical. But the committee said
research was sparse and the finding relied on limited data from animal
testing.
It also noted that high doses of cadmium over long periods of exposure
could cause bone and kidney problems and lung cancer. The committee
recommended that the Army conduct follow-up studies “to determine
whether inhaled zinc cadmium sulfide breaks down into toxic cadmium
compounds, which can be absorbed into the blood to produce toxicity in
the lungs and other organs.”
But it isn’t clear if follow-up studies were ever performed.
Martino-Taylor said she has gotten no answer from the Army and her
research has turned up no additional studies. Foster, the Army
spokesman, declined comment.
Martino-Taylor became involved years ago when a colleague who grew up in
the targeted area wondered if the testing was the cause of her cancer.
That same day, a second colleague confided to Martino-Taylor that she,
too, lived in the test area and had cancer.
Martino-Taylor decided to research the testing for her doctoral thesis
at the University of Missouri. She believes the St. Louis study was
linked to the Manhattan Atomic Bomb Project and a small group of
scientists from that project who were developing radiological weapons. A
congressional study in 1993 confirmed radiological testing in Tennessee
and parts of the West during the Cold War.
“There are strong lines of evidence that there was a radiological component to the St. Louis study,” Martino-Taylor said.
Blunt, in his letter to the Army secretary, questioned whether radioactive testing was performed.
“The idea that thousands of Missourians were unwillingly exposed to
harmful materials in order to determine their health effects is
absolutely shocking,” the senator wrote.
McCaskill agreed. “Given the nature of these experiments, it’s not
surprising that Missouri citizens still have questions and concerns
about what exactly occurred and if there may have been any negative
health effects,” she said in a statement.
Martino-Taylor said a follow-up health study should be performed in St.
Louis, but it must involve direct input from people who lived in the
targeted areas.
“Their voices have not been heard,” Martino-Taylor said.
http://news.yahoo.com/secret-cold-war-tests-st-louis-raise-concerns-214608828.html
No comments:
Post a Comment